Page 2 of 2
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:13 am
by Tom
Large Gauge chart coming soon! you can thank James
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:27 am
by JAMESD00DCHILL!
woop woop!

Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:55 pm
by Nic
Thx James!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:45 pm
by jayness1369
i think its fine... if its not what u wanted, go to google... dont be gay
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:54 am
by StrickyCub
jayness1369 wrote:i think its fine... if its not what u wanted, go to google... dont be gay
Don't be hetero, straight bitch.

Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:33 am
by BeeRett
Heres everything after an inch...
1", 1 1/8", 1 1/4", 1 3/8", 1 1/2", 1 5/8", 1 3/4", 1 7/8", 2", etc....
normally after 5/8", theyre are only 1/8" jumps, after 1", 1/16" jumps are completely ignored.
go big or go home.
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:21 am
by xCODYx
I thought i would add a more detailed size chart, from 18g through 3 inches.
The sizes boxed in red are the "rarely" used / in between sizes where-as the sizes boxed in blue are "less" used but used much more frequently than the red sizes.
I didn't bother boxing any sizes after 1 inch because you should be taping / slowly stretching after 1 inch. If you're stretching correctly you should be at every size after 1 inch, since your tape is only going to add a fraction of a mm per wrap.
Hope you guys find this useful.

Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:18 am
by Drrob
That is a fantastic list, thanks Cody !
Dr Rob.
Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:54 pm
by xCODYx
You're welcome. Glad you like it!

Re: Sizes illustrated here (pic)
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:25 pm
by ggallenfan
JAMESD00DCHILL! wrote:I must say this is broad as FUCK.
And you should have gone up to like 2 and 1/2.
Whatevs, meh'.
Once you get past 00 isn*t it self explanitory?